Reviewing and ranking every Star Trek movie

I'm still making my way through the excellent Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. While watching that series, though, I've had a nostalgic hankering for the two preceding Trek series, which I hadn't watched in years. So I figured: why not watch the movies? I'd never seen any of the Star Trek movies other than the 2009 J.J. Abrams movie, despite several of them being considered classics.

Anyway, TL;DR, here are the reviews I wrote for each of these movies on my Letterboxd, preserved in one convenient place! And then at the end I'll rank them from best to worst with some closing thoughts!

This post contains scattered spoilers for the various movies discussed.

The Original Series Movies

Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979)

Count me among the people who think this one was unfairly maligned as "boring." This movie has two main goals: to get the Enterprise crew back together, and to luxuriate in its special effects budget. This is a movie about long, slow shots of giant things in outer space and, man, it's fucking cool when there's a giant thing in outer space. The space shots in this are still absolutely gorgeous, whether it's a kaleidoscopic energy cloud or an unfathomably large ship. Admittedly, yes, the actual characters and story and themes kind of fall by the wayside in the back half as the movie basks in the awe of this imagery. But also the big twist in the climax rules, so I have to love it.

(My fondness for this movie only grew as the later movies shifted further and further away from material like this in favor of blockbuster action. The colossal alien ship is still one of the most stunning things I've ever seen done with miniatures in a movie. They deserved to linger on every shot of it.)

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982)

I will say up front that this IS a good movie that I enjoyed watching, but I have to admit, after a lifetime of hearing Trekkies call this the best thing ever, finally sitting down to watch this... I don't think it lives up to the hype?

I don' t think this is the massive improvement over the first movie it's made out to be. I think it's about as good, just with a different set of strengths and weaknesses, ones that I guess are more broadly palatable compared to the niche appeal of the slow first movie. The human drama is undoubtedly much stronger here, with some great performances and more of an emotional impact. But I think it's less interesting and creative as a sci-fi story.

Very little would have to change if you transposed this to a story about some bad guys hijacking a submarine armed with nukes. For most of the movie Project Genesis might as well be any other doomsday weapon, with the terraforming angle feeling pretty underutilized beyond the imagery of the ending and ONE brief conversation about its ethical implications. There are, what, two alien characters in the whole movie? Spock and Saavik? And it does nothing with the philosophical angle of Khan's background as this Übermensch created by 20th century eugenics who literally ruled a quarter of the world for a while. It only comes up in a brief recap of the plot of the TV episode he originates from near the start of the film. For the rest of this movie he's just this really crafty guy obsessed with getting revenge on Kirk. And he's entertaining, sure, but he's not that INTERESTING to me. In hindsight Wrath of Khan feels like patient zero for many later Trek stories, the movies especially, where having the crew fight a really evil guy is more important than exploring interesting scientific or philosophical ideas through the lens of sci-fi. (This is foreshadowing for half of the rest of this post.)

Again, on its own terms, it's a good movie and a fun watch, and yes, it saved the franchise. But it's not quite peak Star Trek to me.

Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (1984)

This attempts to find a happy middle ground between the human drama of Wrath of Khan and the sci-fi spectacle and spirituality of the first movie. It's juggling a few too many ideas to quite come together as a coherent whole, but I find most of those individual ideas entertaining, so it works out okay overall. It's perhaps the most Star Trek of these movies so far.

It's funny how they keep harping on the idea that the Enterprise crew is getting too old and Starfleet is replacing them when we've still got FOUR movies to go with Kirk. It's very funny to me how easy it was for them to steal the Enterprise. The entire rest of Starfleet is just woefully incompetent. A lot of this movie is spent fighting over Genesis again, which kind of makes it feel like a retread of Wrath of Khan, but also I didn't think that movie fully explored the concept of Genesis, so I don't really mind. Christopher Lloyd's Klingon villain whose name I already forgot isn't particularly threatening, but he is funny in a campy way. It's also frankly a little insane that they gave Kirk a son and then killed him off in the very next movie, but it's even more insane that they had Kirk blow up the whole original Enterprise to kill like five Klingons from a random crew.

Ultimately, though, this is a movie about how Kirk would do anything to get Spock back, and his genuine affection is incredibly sweet and touching. (The heartbroken tenderness with which Jim says "we were separated, he couldn't touch me"... look, the queer readings didn't come from nowhere.) That goes a long way towards making me forgive it, despite the fact that this movie is effectively 100 minutes spent undoing the previous movie.

Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (1986)

Yeah I think I'm a person who thinks the silly whale movie might be the best one

Given its reputation I was kind of surprised by how serious and how traditionally Trek the first half hour felt. It's also like a disaster movie as the giant alien probe causes catastrophic weather across the globe. And then they get to the 20th century. God, this movie is funny. The stuff with the Enterprise crew not fitting in on modern day Earth could have devolved into cynical self-parody meant to attract a non-Trekkie audience, but it's so funny and charming throughout. This movie puts a big dumb smile on my face. I love it. Just an excuse to have a nice time with these characters. It also relishes in the fact that they got to film a Trek movie in a real city without having to dress it up or anything. San Francisco feels very lively in this movie. It's great!

I genuinely wish this was the blueprint for modern Star Trek movies instead of Wrath of Khan. I do not need a big evil bad guy who loves murder and wants to blow up a hundred planets in every one of these movies. Just take the crew and stick them in a memorable sci-fi situation, and let their personalities bounce off of each other and the characters around them. Sometimes you don't need a giant space battle at the climax, you can just show a humpback whale forming an emotional bond with an incomprehensible alien life form that looks like a giant shape and the Enterprise crew cackling with glee as they splash around in the San Francisco Bay. Absolutely delightful.

Star Trek V: The Final Frontier (1989)

They let Shatner direct a movie and he used that as an opportunity to fight a three-breasted catgirl. Good for you, man.

A lot of neat ideas that don't come together into a coherent package, with a half-baked script, poorly directed action scenes, and shoddy special effects that really don't sell the spiritual grandeur that the climax needed. However, I can't bring myself to truly dislike it. I could watch Kirk, Spock, and Bones in just about any situation and probably end up being entertained, and they get a lot of good character moments here. It's subpar, but charming.

(Having now watched the rest of the movies, this is certainly the worst of the TOS entries, but it's kind of shocking to me that anyone would ever consider this for the title of the absolute worst film in the whole franchise. It's dumb, it's campy, it needed a second draft, but it's still pretty fun. I'd rewatch this in a heartbeat over several of the later movies.)

Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (1991)

"If there is to be a brave new world, our generation is going to have the hardest time living in it."

I think The Voyage Home might still be my personal favorite just because it's so damn fun, but this is the actual best of the TOS movies. Which is surprising, because I never hear anyone talk about this one!

The idea of a political thriller murder mystery where the assassination of a Klingon ambassador threatens to disrupt peace negotiations is such a rich vein for drama, and the movie delivers on that promise. (Though it also manages to be funny in a much more natural way than the previous movie.) Love that Kirk has very real flaws other than "he cares about his friends too much and will break the rules in really badass ways to save them," and he's confronted on his prejudice and has to grow and change and admit that it's time to step aside and let a new generation take over. Also very cool to see a TOS movie admit that Starfleet isn't always the good guys! As a DS9 fan who loves it when Star Trek gets a little more cynical about the politics of its galaxy this one really does a lot for me. Hard to imagine a much better sendoff for the original Enterprise crew.

The Next Generation Movies

Star Trek: Generations (1994)

I shudder to think that there are still two TNG movies left that fans consider even worse than this, because I thought this was absolutely atrocious. At least I was mildly amused by the fact that Connor from Succession was the captain of the Enterprise-B, I guess?

This is, of course, The One Where Kirk Meets Picard. Except they don't actually meet until over 75% of the way through the movie. Once we get past the opening sequence with Kirk and the two other TOS cast members who had nothing better to do, it becomes an interminably boring TNG two-parter with the ship set to mood lighting mode for most of its runtime.

I'm mostly left thinking about how awful of an introduction this would be to the TNG crew if I'd never seen an episode of the TV show, and I was just watching Star Trek as a film series. This movie is constantly bogged down by technobabble explanations for its convoluted plot, leaving nothing for the TNG cast to do. Picard's arc is motivated by the fact that his brother and nephew from a single episode of the show apparently died in a fire off-screen. Data gets to ham it up for a comedy subplot about him installing his emotion chip, turning him into a different, way more annoying character. Nobody else gets to do much of anything or have much of a personality. At least the saucer crash scene is well done, I guess?

Then in the third act Picard retrieves Kirk from a time anomaly so that they can chase Malcolm McDowell around on some rocks for a little bit to stop him from firing a missile at the sun, Kirk can fall to his death pathetically, and Picard can bury him in a shallow grave. Yippee! Team up of the century! I'm so glad they brought Shatner back for one last adventure after his beautiful sendoff in The Undiscovered Country!

Just a waste of time all around. I can't believe people call The Motion Picture "the boring one" when this exists.

Star Trek: First Contact (1996)

Hell yeah, now that's more like it. What an incredible step up over Generations.

This movie just gets right into it. A big battle in space! Time travel back to the 21st century! The Borg taking over the Enterprise and trying to rewrite history! It's just constantly moving forward in that first act, everyone always ready to get shit done, but in a way that's very easy to follow.

It does, however, find time to slow down for a lot of good character moments in the second act. Unlike in Generations, everyone has a chance to shine. The 21st century characters learning about the future from the Enterprise crew. Data and the Borg Queen acting as foils for each other—a machine who wants to become more human, and a cyborg who wants to turn all of mankind into machines. It's great stuff! I'm a person who dislikes the attempts to turn Star Trek into a big dumb blockbuster action franchise, but this strikes a good balance to me. It can have Picard shoot some Borg with a Tommy gun on the Holodeck, but it can also have solid character work.

I dunno. Maybe I'm going easy on it because Generations set such a low bar for the TNG movies. Does putting Riker and Geordi on the test flight that led to mankind's first contact with life from another planet, setting the Star Trek timeline as we know it in motion, perhaps make this world feel smaller in that typical franchise-y way? Probably. It's a little stupid. But I also like that the inventor of warp technology is kind of a scumbag who rankles with the Enterprise crew's perception of him as a Great Man. He's not that. He's just some jackass who happened to make a huge scientific breakthrough for selfish reasons. But you don't have to be uniquely great to change history. Anybody can make a difference.

Star Trek: Insurrection (1998)

This one has some fun and cute character moments with the crew that keep it from being a total slog like Generations was, but man, the plot and conflict here suck.

Let's step back and break down what this movie is about, once everything is revealed, because it's so profoundly stupid. 300 years ago some white people who disavowed technology and wanted to cut themselves off from the rest of the galaxy settled on what turned out to be the Fountain of Youth planet. Some sort of particle from the planet's rings grants immortality and can cure any illness. Anything! We see it cure Geordi's blindness! Everything was hunky dory for a couple hundred years, until a few of their kids got nasty outsider ideas and tried to take over the planet for... some reason? They were exiled and began to age again. Now, 100 years later, they're barely kept alive by medical technology and have to use a machine to stretch out their face skin to keep it from sagging off. They're gross, so that's how you can tell they're evil! Anyway they still want to live forever, I guess, so they work with a Starfleet admiral to formulate a plan to gather up the magic panacea particles from the planet's rings to, again, give the galaxy the ultimate wonder drug that will grant immortality. Except they can't figure out any way to do this that doesn't leave the planet irradiated and uninhabitable, for plot reasons so arbitrary and half-baked that even the admiral can't be assed to give a real explanation when pressed about it.

And so Picard catches wind of this and goes against his superior officer to protect this tiny settlement of 600 people from the evil villains trying to produce a cure for every disease known to man. It is incredibly contrived on every level. The exiled bad guys couldn't just, I don't know... go land on the opposite side of the planet from the village and soak up the immortality particles over there? It's a whole planet with one village! They'd never know! No, they need the WHOLE PLANET all to themselves!

They probably could've made this one work with another draft. For one, maybe don't make literally all of the villagers white humans who want to Reject Modernity, Embrace Tradition? It gives off some incredibly unfortunate political undertones when the perfect little white isolationist cottagecore settlers are having their picturesque colonial home stolen from them by the multicultural Federation as part of a secret conspiracy. It's deeply uncomfortable whenever Picard tries to make comparisons to real world colonial displacements. Or maybe they could've said something about how the search for immortality is inherently foolish and perverse—the imagery of the stretched skin on the Son'a seems perfect for this. Instead they landed on "actually immortality is awesome but only these specific 600 Amish people get to be immortal because they lucked out and colonized the immortality planet first."

Also, I kinda just wish they'd made this a DS9 movie. I had this thought every time they mentioned the Dominion, or Worf being transferred to DS9. This feels closer to the kind of stuff that show deals with. I kept having flashbacks to the episode where Kira is ordered to kick that old man off his land because the Federation needs it. They made a subpar TNG episode and stretched it out to feature length, when I wish they'd made a pretty good DS9 episode and stretched it out to feature length instead.

Star Trek: Nemesis (2002)

The first time the Star Trek film series outright asked "what if we just did a version of Wrath of Khan that sucked ass," and unfortunately not the last.

I really wanted to have a dissenting opinion on this one. I wanted to see the good in it. I love stories about characters who were created to be dark copies of the hero and are tragically doomed because of it. But for one, Tom Hardy just doesn't look or sound like Picard, no matter how bald they make him, so that kind of falls flat. And the plot about him being made the leader of the underclass of slaves from the planet he was banished to and all of them deciding to just start being evil and wipe out all life on Earth is incredibly dumb. But most damning: this movie is just soooooooo fucking boriiiinnnnggggg. I can't believe I stayed awake for that unbearably long third act that's just wall to wall dull action with zero interesting character work going on. I checked the time and couldn't believe I still had half an hour left.

This is also the worst offender for the TNG movies forgetting that the show was an ensemble series and that there are more characters than just Picard and Data. The latter has to have a big heroic sacrifice at the climax of the movie, because they're echoing Wrath of Khan, but it's so hollow compared to the emotional goodbye Kirk and Spock have on opposite sides of the glass. Data just kind of shows up to save Picard, teleports him out, and dies, and that's it. The movie had already set up that they picked up a spare Data with all of his memories backed up, so it's immediately obvious how they're going to undo the death.

Also, uh. Did we really need a random scene where the bad guys psychically rape Troi while she's trying to have sex with Riker? And Picard tells her to just tough it out if they do it again? Just so they can have a scene where she psychically determines the location of the villains' cloaked ship later? Come the fuck on, man.

Just awful all around. As bad as I thought Generations and Insurrection were, they at least had their moments and some bits that are funny-bad. Out of all ten of the Star Trek movies starring the TV casts, this is the only one I don't think I would ever willingly watch again.

The "Kelvin Timeline" Movies

Star Trek (2009)

I know people have been making jokes about the lens flares since 2009 but it really is like that, huh. It wasn't an exaggeration.

I really liked this movie when I first saw it in theaters as a teenager, and then again in 11th grade when my graphic design teacher played a pirated copy on the projector over a few class periods. Coming back to it now, as an adult who's seen more Star Trek stuff and wants different things out of the franchise, I'm more mixed. It's a pretty decent big dumb sci-fi action blockbuster movie, but a pretty weak Star Trek movie.

Despite all the on-the-nose fanservice, much of this movie feels embarrassed to even be a Star Trek movie. It spends its first act trying to prove that it isn't like those boring stuffy old shows your dad watched about people debating human nature on a sound stage and punching each other with both hands clasped. It's full of big explosions and fast cars and sex and a Beastie Boys needle drop. Spock has to get pissed the fuck off and fight people, Kirk has to be a womanizing douche who gets into bar fights. The camera is constantly moving and shaking and rotating, lights are always flashing and glaring at you, people are always frantically running around the ships. BOY can you tell this was made in the Bayformers era, and also that the guys who wrote the first two Bayformers movies also wrote this.

One of my favorite things about TOS and TNG is the camaraderie of the crew. They can disagree on things and bicker, sure, but at its heart those shows are about taking a team of people who are the best at what they do, who all really love and respect each other, and sending them out into space together. But this movie chooses to be an origin story about how Kirk and Spock overcame their apparent personality clash when they first met, which means that instead of being best friends they have to spend most of the movie as rivals who argue and shout over each other. They only begrudgingly seem to get along at the end because Leonard Nimoy shows up and tells them that they're supposed to be friends. And also Spock has to make out with Uhura so that you don't get any funny ideas about him being gay for Kirk. Unless you think Spock choking out Kirk is hot, in which case you do you I guess. (I think Chekov and Scotty stand out so much because they're the two characters who are just likeable and good at their jobs and happy to be there.)

What we're left with is a movie with, what, the Star Trek film franchise's sixth Evil Guy Who Wants To Wipe Out One Or More Planets Because Revenge? Nero is so goddamn lame. Otherwise it's a movie about moving all the pieces in place so that the stars of TOS are in the positions you expect them to be, and they say the lines you expect them to say. And we get there via a plot filled with contrived conveniences. The series of events that leads to Kirk becoming captain is kicked off because the villain who killed his dad right as he was being born just so happened to return on the very same day of the Enterprise's maiden voyage. No one else is capable of remembering that major incident, it has to be Kirk. And of course Kirk snuck onto the ship for its maiden voyage immediately after cheating on the Kobayashi Maru. Did we really need that story? It's competently made, disorienting action direction aside, but it doesn't have any worthwhile ideas of its own.

Uhhh anyway I forgot how much of an overt DeForest Kelley impression Karl Urban does as Bones in this. That's funny. The casting in this is generally its strongest asset. Everyone's on point, even if I don't love the movie they got put in. The Force Awakens also got carried by its incredibly charming and fun new cast, despite mostly just being a retread of A New Hope. JJ Abrams should just be a casting consultant instead of being allowed to touch the director's chair ever again.

Star Trek Into Darkness (2013)

I'm going back in time and preventing 9/11 specifically so this movie never gets made

Star Trek is a series that presents a blank canvas to explore basically any concept you want, but the people assigned to make its various film adaptations mostly just wanted to keep going back to the Wrath of Khan formula with action-oriented stories about vengeful villains who want to do a genocide. This movie takes it to a new level by straight up just doing Khan again, and also casting him with an even whiter actor than TOS did.

I thought I understood how creatively bankrupt this movie was when they had to have New Spock facetime with Old Spock and ask him what happened in Wrath of Khan and what his and Kirk's relationship is with Khan as a narrative shortcut. This was already bad. And then they literally redid Spock's death scene from Wrath of Khan in reverse! It's new because this time KIRK is on the other side of the glass making the heroic sacrifice! These two have basically no relationship in this version and don't even really like each other, but it'll remind you of the original scene from a better movie, so please cry. Oh, but actually don't worry, eugenics turned Khan's blood into SUPER BLOOD that lets him cheat death, so we can pump Kirk full of some of that stuff and save his life! Thanks, eugenics!

These sequences had me so aghast that it basically immediately overwrote the rest of the movie in my memory, but it's not like there's much to write home about there. There's an ATTEMPT at a theme about the conflict between Starfleet's stated mission as peaceful explorers and their more militaristic side, which maybe could've been something, but it's mostly just another big loud blockbuster action movie where the young Kirk has to prove that he's not just a loose cannon and that he really is worthy of being captain, just like the last one. Except this one has a little bit of post-9/11 allegory on the side. Just wretched.

They even redo the ending of the last movie where they put everything in place for the Enterprise crew to go on TOS-style adventures and then play the TV show's theme tune over the credits! Technically last time they didn't say the crew was on their five-year mission, so they get to say that this time so you can be like WHOOOAAAA, they're gonna go on the five-year mission! Just like the show! I wonder what amazing adventures they'll get up to? Hold on someone is handing me a note saying they only made one more of these movies

Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Hey! This one was pretty good!

I mean it's not, like, AMAZING. I'm becoming a broken record at this point, but it's still yet another blockbuster action movie about a villain who wants to wipe out the Federation in an act of revenge. But at least this one has a better script and, y'know... some ideas of its own? Beyond just referencing Wrath of Khan? I'm kind of surprised they'd never done a movie about the Enterprise crew being marooned on an unknown planet and having to find each other. That seems so obvious! I didn't love the villain that facilitated that plot, but I do like what The Big Twist does for this movie thematically. Also: the Yorktown station looks really cool.

It's still a sequel to the previous two movies, so some baggage is inevitable. Kirk starts the movie still feeling more like a kid who lucked into being captain through circumstance, rather than the charismatic leader he's supposed to be. But I thought he was pretty okay by the end. Notably, his exaggerated womanizing is completely gone! No longer does Kirk crane his neck every time he sees a woman walk by. It helps that this is more of an ensemble movie, too, giving the rest of the crew more to do. Also, the lens flares are gone and the handheld shaky cam work is toned WAY down, so the gratuitous action scenes that are here are much easier to follow than the ones in the Abrams movies. It even managed to do a callback to the Beastie Boys scene from the '09 movie that actually worked for me.

An interesting touch I noticed here is the way this movie uses language. Oftentimes in Star Trek it goes unremarked upon that most of the aliens are speaking English, perhaps with a ship-board auto-translator used as an excuse. Here, we have aliens who speak their own languages, aliens who explain that they've learned English but maybe aren't quite fluent in it, and also one alien who has a digitized voice auto-translating what she says into English. It's not a huge thing, but it's an example of how a bit more care and attention to detail was put into this one.

Again, not the best Star Trek movie, but they clearly had fun making this one, and I had fun watching it.

And also...

Star Trek: Section 31 (2025)

I made it 25 minutes into this. I can't do this. I have to love myself.

I got through the introduction of the team. Every single one of them is more insufferable than the last with all of their obnoxious quirks and the forced attempts at naturalistic cross-talk banter. Imagine The Asylum trying to do a ripoff of Guardians of the Galaxy or Suicide Squad, but in the Star Trek universe, and also someone inexplicably gave them a budget and access to Michelle Yeoh. It's like nails on a fucking chalkboard, but it thinks it's the most cool and badass thing ever. Even without the terrible acting and digital zoom-filled editing this script would be unbearable. It's not so-bad-it's-good, I genuinely just had to turn it off.

And that's before you even get to the politics of it all, with Epic Girlboss Cannibal Hitler from the mirror universe being recruited by what's effectively Starfleet's CIA, operating in the shadows and doing the secret war crimes that are "necessary" for """the greater good.""" And of course the one Starfleet officer on the team is treated as the wet blanket for questioning the morality of their mission.

This is what happens when you approach Star Trek not as a work of art trying to convey certain ideas, but rather a bunch of toys to play with. This movie is hopelessly dependent on familiarity with Star Trek as a franchise, and is probably completely impenetrable to anyone who isn't already a fan, but it also completely eschews everything that's good about Star Trek aside from "it's in space and there's aliens and shit." Every single creative decision made here was the wrong one.

You know what? I don't want to end it here. Let's go out on a high note.

Galaxy Quest (1999)

The (not-so-)secret contender for the best Star Trek movie. I wouldn't say it's quite the best, but it's up there.

I think a big part of the reason why this movie works so well is that it ropes in casual viewers by making it seem like it's going to be a more cynical and mean-spirited parody of Star Trek, echoing common beliefs that it was a cheesy old show with a washed up cast and cringey fans... and then it ends up largely playing its conflict and adventure straight. It pokes fun at Star Trek and Trekkies along the way, but it does so affectionately, and there's still room for genuine excitement and drama. There are real stakes! People die, and not as a joke! Even characters as absurd as the Thermians get some genuinely heartfelt moments. (The way Mathesar chokes out "But why?" when Jason explains to him that the show was all fake is kind of heartbreaking!) By the end the cast has shed every remaining ounce of cynicism they had about their goofy old show and they're all just really into it. There's a reason why this movie ended up becoming a genuine sci-fi cult classic in its own right.

But also, more importantly: this movie is still incredibly funny. Tim Allen is, y'know, fine as the leading man, but everyone else? Perfect. Spot on. Constantly hilarious and delivering so many quotable lines. What a great cast. Alan Rickman and Sigourney Weaver tend to be singled out for good reason, but I also want to highlight Tony Shalhoub's character who seemed to be at least a little stoned for the whole adventure and faced almost everything with this placid acceptance. His delivery is so good. It's such a funny contrast to the way everyone else is freaking out all the time. I think the moment where he calls for a group hug with the Thermians in engineering is one of my favorite little jokes.


Anyway, without further ado, here's how I'd rank all these movies:

  1. The Undiscovered Country
  2. The Voyage Home
  3. First Contact
  4. The Motion Picture
  5. The Wrath of Khan
  6. Galaxy Quest (if you'd count that)
  7. The Search for Spock
  8. Beyond
  9. The Final Frontier
  10. Star Trek '09
  11. Insurrection
  12. Generations
  13. Into Darkness
  14. Nemesis
  15. Section 31

And what did we learn from all this? Well...

  • "The odd ones are bad and the even ones are good" is almost true, but an oversimplification. There's something to like in all six of the TOS movies.
  • The Motion Picture is kind of mid, but also kicks ass. Sometimes this is one of the best things a work of fiction can be.
  • Star Trek has relied on hacky plots about revenge and super weapons since long before Alex Kurtzman became the steward of the franchise.
  • Star Trek has always fluctuated between being good and being bad, and has struggled with trying to shake off its dweeby reputation with some mix of crowd-pleasing action, comedy, and/or a younger and sexier cast basically every time it's been revived.
  • Sincerity is awesome. Even when it's cringe. ESPECIALLY when it's cringe.
  • Your mom was right for shipping Spirk.

Comments